One document set in.
One report out.
Everything an evaluator would likely say about your paperwork, said early enough to fix — with the fix already drafted.
A finding for every criterion in scope.
The evaluators’ three-tier vocabulary
Good practice evident, development desirable, or action required — so the report reads the way your next evaluation will.
“Not evidenced” is not “not applicable”
Where your set doesn’t cover something: not evidenced in the document set provided. Where a criterion doesn’t apply to your service type: not applicable. They call for very different responses, so they get different labels.
Document, section, criterion number
Every finding points to the exact place — and every actionable finding arrives with drafted remediation wording, ready to adapt into your own voice.
Three ways in, one fixed price each.
| Review | When it fits |
|---|---|
| Surveillance readiness | Ahead of a mid-cycle surveillance audit — the narrower criterion set |
| Certification readiness | Ahead of full certification or re-certification — the complete scope |
| Where-we-stand | No audit booked — the same review, on your calendar instead of theirs |
Multi-site and larger providers: we scope together first, then quote. Every review is a fixed price agreed in writing before we begin — no day rates, no open-ended engagements. Asking costs nothing.
After the report
- Findings walkthrough — a working session talking the report through with your quality lead or manager, available with any review.
- Standing readiness — for providers who’d rather stay ready than get ready: we review new and changed documents as you produce them, alert you when the standard or evaluation programme moves, and refresh everything before your next audit. Fully asynchronous — no standing meetings.